Wednesday, June 1, 2016

Academic Council - April 19, 2016

1. Approval of Academic Council meeting minutes from April 5, 2016

Dr. Sam Abrash moved approval of the minutes of April 5, 2016. Dr. Bill Ross seconded. With no further discussion, the minutes were approved by voice vote.

2. Strategic Planning Process—Dr. Jan French

Dr. Jan French, President of the Faculty Senate and Steering Committee Co-Chair, updated Academic Council on the Strategic Planning Process. In particular, the Strategic Planning Committee’s website was reviewed. Dr. French explained the drafting process that has gone into the mission statement, the values statement, the vision statement, and the themes, which will, in the future, become the basis for charges to working groups. Following this brief presentation, there was discussion.

Dr. Sam Abrash offered his support for Academic Excellence as a value to be featured prominently in the Strategic Planning Process going forward.

Dr. Nicole Sackley disagreed with this idea, suggesting that if the University is to keep something like Academic Excellence as a core value, perhaps Academic Council might strive to come up with a different word and a more expansive definition.

Dr. Hugh West pointed out that, having been through this process on more than one occasion, the working groups will flesh out the definition, and then come back and revise after the work has been completed.

Dr. Mike Kerckhove voiced his support for Dr. Sackley’s sentiment.

Dr. Dan Palazzolo reprised his suggestion—first voiced at the Academic Council meeting on April 5, 2016—that Academic Freedom and Intellectual Community might be added to the values. Specifically, Dr. Palazzolo asked if Academic Council might be able to reach a consensus regarding the importance of these values, and thus recommend them, as a body, to the Strategic Planning Process Steering Committee.

Dr. Nicole Sackley suggested that Academic Council try to define these values before voting to recommend them.

Dr. Sam Abrash advocated voting to endorse the values of academic freedom and intellectual community.

Dr. Dan Palazzolo made a motion that Academic Freedom and Intellectual Community be forwarded to the Strategic Planning Process Steering Committee, on behalf of the whole of Academic Council, for consideration as values. Dr. Hugh West seconded. Without further discussion, the motion passed by voice vote.  [Following the meeting, Dean Skerrett and Dr. French forwarded to the Strategic Planning Process Steering Committee this recommendation from A&S Academic Council.]

3. Approval of Modification to B.S. degree requirements—UAPC April 15, 2016

Dean Skerrett reported that Dr. Jacque Fetrow, Provost, reported on April 15, 2016, that the UAPC has voted to approve the Modification to the B.S. degree requirements endorsed by Academic Council and approved by the A&S Faculty. The provost will notify the Board of Trustees of the modification to the B.S. degree requirements at the October meeting in 2016.

4. DAC Spring Report—Dr. Jon Dattelbaum

Dr. Jon Dattelbaum, Chair of the Dean’s Advisory Council, reported that DAC is continuing its work in reviewing position requests this spring.  [Dean Skerrett advanced position requests endorsed by DAC to the provost for approval.] 

Dr. Dattelbaum also noted that Dr. Kathy Hoke will become Chair of DAC, effective July 2016.

5. Academic Continuity Planning—Brittany Schaal

Brittany Schaal, Director of Emergency Management, gave a presentation on preparedness and academic continuity planning. During her presentation, Ms. Schaal reviewed the UR Ready Guidebook that allows a department to develop a Continuity of Operations (COOP) Plan in case of emergency. Ms. Schaal PowerPoint presentation about Academic Continuity is attached to the agenda and can be reviewed in full.  Ms. Schaal would like to work with each department chair in Fall 2016 to develop an academic continuity plan for each department.

6. Contingent Faculty Reform Initiative—Dr. Vincent Wang

Dr. Vincent Wang, Associate Dean, provided an on the implementation of Contingent Faculty Reform Initiative (CFRI), which was launched by the School of Arts & Sciences in Spring 2014. During his presentation, Dr. Wang reviewed the main objectives of the CFRI, the strategies by which the CFRI objectives have been worked towards, and the results thus far.

Dr. Wang’s presentation is attached to agenda in full.  Dr. Wang noted especially the reconfiguration of several “chronic” term appointment into tenure-track positions and the increase in compensation for term and adjunct faculty.

7. Merit Outcomes & Salary Recommendations—Dr. Ben Broening

Dr. Ben Broening, Associate Dean, gave a presentation on merit outcomes and salary recommendations.  He stated that the Dean’s office is committed to transparency in allocation of merit scores and systematic allocation of merit-based salary awards.  The dean noted the importance of the increase in promotion bumps this year and the ongoing commitment of the University’s Budget Office to benchmarking faculty salaries by rank against reported salaries of our peers (top 50 national liberal arts colleges).  Dean Skerrett observed the importance of presenting year-over-year data so that A&S faculty members gain a clear understanding of how merit and benchmarking investments are made.  In response to a request made last year, Dean Skerrett presented data that compares average salary by gender and rank.  She noted that the Dean’s office has strived to achieve gender parity for male and female faculty members across all ranks for individuals under fifteen years in rank.

8.  A&S Faculty Dinner to celebrate retirements and years of service—April 29, 2016, Alice Haynes Room, 6:00-8:30

Dean Skerrett welcomed members of Academic Council to attend the A&S Faculty Dinner at the end of the semester.  During the A&S Faculty Dinner, in addition to celebrating faculty members who have achieved 25 years of service, we will celebrate the following faculty members, who are retiring emerita/us: Suzanne Jones, David Leary, William Myers, Vincent Wang, and Reed West.

Dean Skerrett thanked the members of Academic Council for their contributions to faculty governance over the past five years.


The meeting adjourned at 11:45 a.m.

A&S Faculty Meeting - April 14, 2016

1. Approval of A&S Faculty Meeting minutes from March 17, 2016

Dr. Julie Laskaris moved approval of the minutes of March 17, 2016. Dr. Laz Lima seconded. With no further discussion, the minutes were approved by voice vote.

2. Approval of Actions of Academic Council from April 5, 2016

Dr. Bill Ross moved approval of the actions of Academic Council from April 5, 2016. Dr. Beth Crawford seconded. With no further discussion, the actions were approved by voice vote.

3. Honors Convocation and 31st Annual Student Symposium – April 15, 2016

Dean Skerrett reminded faculty that on Friday, April 15, the Honors Convocation and 31st Annual Student Symposium will take place.  This is the largest Student Symposium we have ever had with more than 364 students scheduled to participate.  This is also the largest number of faculty mentors ever involved.  Dean Skerrett commended Symposium Coordinator Dr. Cindy Bukach for her outstanding efforts.

4. Merit Outcomes & Salary Recommendations – Dean Skerrett

Dr. Ben Broening, Associate Dean, gave a presentation on merit outcomes and salary recommendations.   Dr. Ben Broening, Associate Dean, gave a presentation on merit outcomes and salary recommendations.  He stated that the Dean’s office is committed to transparency in allocation of merit scores and systematic allocation of merit-based salary awards.  The dean noted the importance of the increase in promotion bumps this year and the ongoing commitment of the University’s Budget Office to benchmarking faculty salaries by rank against reported salaries of our peers (top 50 national liberal arts colleges).  Dean Skerrett observed the importance of presenting year-over-year data so that A&S faculty members gain a clear understanding of how merit and benchmarking investments are made.  In response to a request made last year, Dean Skerrett presented data that compares average salary by gender and rank.  She noted that the Dean’s office has strived to achieve gender parity for male and female faculty members across all ranks for individuals under fifteen years in rank.

5. Race & Racism at UR Project – Dr. Nicole Maurantonio

Dr. Nicole Maurantonio, Associate Professor of Rhetoric and Communications, gave a presentation on the Race & Racism at UR Project. Dr. Maurantonio showed faculty the website that houses the pilot project—memory.richmond.edu—and noted that Dean Skerrett has hired a Project Archivist to assist with this initiative.  The Project Archivist Irina Rogova has been appointed as a librarian.  The recent visit by Dr. Craig Wilder has increased excitement about this ongoing project.  Dean Skerrett noted that she plans to appoint the first Humanities Postbaccalaureate Fellow Victoria Charles this summer, who will pursue research in connection with the Race & Racism at UR Project.

6. Preliminary Report from the Ad Hoc Committee on Promotion – Dr. Sheila Carapico

Dr. Sheila Carapico, Chair of the Ad Hoc Committee on Promotion, presented a preliminary summary of findings of the Survey on Promotion and Triennial Review. During her presentation, Dr. Carapico discussed the robust response rate and the fact that a representative sample has been gathered. Dr. Carapico presented data from the School of Arts & Sciences Dean’s Office regarding associate professors’ years in rank by division. Dr. Carapico spoke about findings suggesting that associate professors find expectations for promotion unclear, and many report a lack of mentoring to promotion, although faculty are not necessarily calling for more.

Dr. Kathrin Bower, a member of the Ad Hoc Committee on Promotion, presented a motion to extend the work of the Ad Hoc Committee on Promotion. Dr. Yvonne Howell seconded. With no further discussion, the motion passed.

7. Strategic Planning Process – Dr. Jan French

Dr. Jan French, President of the Faculty Senate and Steering Committee Co-Chair, updated A&S Faculty on the Strategic Planning Process. In particular, the Strategic Planning Committee’s website was presented at: https://strategicplan.richmond.edu/. Dr. French encouraged everyone to please provide feedback on the mission statements, values statements, vision statement, and the themes, which will, in the future, become the basis for working groups.

Dean Skerrett thanked everyone for their contributions to faculty governance over the past five years.


The meeting adjourned at 5:00 p.m.

Monday, April 18, 2016

Academic Council - Agenda - April 19, 2016

Academic Council
Tuesday, April 19, 2016
10:30-11:45 a.m.
Keller Hall Reception Room

Please review the agenda below and the cited materials in advance of the meeting.

1. Approval of Academic Council meeting minutes from April 5, 2016

2.   Strategic Planning Process – Dr. Jan French
3.  Approval of Modification to B.S. degree requirements—UAPC April 15, 2016

4.  DAC Spring Report—Dr. Jon Dattelbaum

5. Academic Continuity Planning—Brittany Schaal
6. Contingent Faculty Reform Initiative—Dr. Vincent Wang
7. Merit Outcomes & Salary Recommendations—Dr. Ben Broening

8.  A&S Faculty Dinner to celebrate retirements and years of service—April 29, 2016
Alice Haynes Room, 6:00-8:30

During the A&S Faculty Dinner, in addition to celebrating faculty members who have achieved 25 years of service, we will celebrate the following faculty members, who are retiring emerita/us: Suzanne Jones, David Leary, William Myers, Vincent Wang, and Reed West

Academic Council - April 5, 2016 - Minutes

1. Approval of Academic Council meeting minutes from March 15, 2016

Dr. Sam Abrash moved approval of the minutes of March 15, 2016. Dr. Paul Achter seconded. With no further discussion, the minutes were approved by voice vote.

2. New Course Proposals

PSYC 300 was brought to the floor as a new course proposal. Dr. Geoff Goddu motioned to approve. Dr. Elena Calvillo seconded. With no further discussion, PSYC 300 was approved by voice vote.

3. Revised Course Proposals

PHIL 353 was brought to the floor as a revised course proposal. Dr. Sam Abrash motioned to approve. Dr. Nicole Sackley seconded. With no further discussion, the revised course proposal was approved by voice vote.

4. Revisions to Major/Minor

A proposal for a course requirement change in the Psychology major was brought to the floor. Dr. Sydney Watts motioned to approve. Dr. Sam Abrash seconded. With no further discussion, the proposal for a course requirement change in the Psychology major was approved by voice vote.

5. Department of Labor Regulations for Overtime

Pam Ash, Human Resources Consultant and Strategist, and Carl Sorenson, Associate Vice President of Human Resource, joined Academic Council to discuss the Fair Labor Standards Act. Pam Ash presented the policy on non-exempt employee overtime and flex time. She stressed that a private institution, such as University of Richmond, cannot permit “comp time” (which is deferred time off in exchange for overtime hours). Both Pam Ash and Carl Sorensen stressed the importance of managers and employees fairly and accurately recording employees’ hours worked, according to the guidelines set out in the Fair Labor Standards Act.

The dean said that the FLSA guidelines would be covered again in department chair training in late April.

6. Strategic Planning Process

Dr. Jan French, President of the Faculty Senate and Steering Committee Co-Chair, updated Academic Council on the Strategic Planning Process. All of the documents are attached to the agenda in full. They are also available on the Strategic Planning Committee’s website. Dr. French spoke at length about the drafting process that has gone into the mission statements, the values statements, the vision statement, and the themes, which will, in the future, become the basis for working groups. Regarding the draft of the mission statement, questions such as: “Does this revised statement effectively capture the University’s core mission? If not, what suggestions do you have for improvement?” were considered. Regarding the draft of the values statements, questions such as: “Does this statement of values effectively articulate the University’s most important values? Are there ways this statement of values could be made more rhetorically powerful?” were considered.

Dr. Sam Abrash pointed out that the Mission Statement does not state a mission.

Regarding the draft of the values statements, Dr. Nicole Sackley commented that the word “Excellence” sounded vacuous. Dr. Paul Achter agreed.

Dr. Sheila Carapico suggested that academic freedom should be a value of the University. Dr. Dan Palazzolo suggested “freedom of expression and freedom of thought.”

In response to Dr. Nicole Sackley and Dr. Paul Achter’s suggestions, Dr. Bill Ross offered that the word excellence should be used, though perhaps not as a value.

After further discussion, Dr. Jan French invited members of Academic Council to visit the website for the Strategic Planning Process—https://strategicplan.richmond.edu/—and enter their comments. She said that she would summarize her notes from the meeting to give to the Strategic Planning Committee.

The dean thanked members of Academic Council for their contributions to the discussion of mission and values. She reminded them of the provost’s initiative to support small group discussions of the mission, values, vision, and themes.

The meeting adjourned at 11:50. 

Wednesday, April 13, 2016

A&S Faculty Meeting Thursday, April 14, 2016

A&S Faculty Meeting
Thursday, April 14, 2016
4:00-5:00 p.m.
Brown Alley Room, Weinstein Hall

Please review the agenda below and the cited materials in advance of the meeting.

1. Approval of A&S Faculty Meeting minutes from March 17, 2016

2. Approval of Actions of Academic Council from April 5, 2016

3. Honors Convocation and 31st Annual Student Symposium – April 15, 2016
4. Summer 2016 Student Research – Dean Skerrett

5. Merit Outcomes & Salary Recommendations – Dean Skerrett

6. Race & Racism at UR Project – Dr. Nicole Maurantonio
7. Preliminary Report from the Ad Hoc Committee on Promotion – Dr. Sheila Carapico
8. Strategic Planning Process – Dr. Jan French

A&S Faculty Meeting Thursday March 17, 2016 - minutes

1. Approval of A&S Faculty Meeting minutes from February 11, 2016

Dr. Bill Ross moved approval of the minutes of February 11, 2016. Dr. Kristine Nolin seconded. With no further discussion, the minutes were approved by voice vote.

2. Approval of Actions of Academic Council from March 1 and March 15, 2016

Dr. Bill Ross moved approval of the actions of Academic Council from March 1 and March 15, 2016. Dr. Michelle Hamm seconded. With no further discussion, the actions were approved by voice vote.

3. Report from A&S Senators

Dr. Jan French, President of the University Faculty Senate, gave a brief report on the work of the A&S Senate. Dr. French shared the committee policy. She also described the four components of President Crutcher’s Strategic Planning Process. Drawing from many rich sources of community input, the Strategic Planning Committee is preparing a Mission Statement, Value Statement, Vision and Themes. These will be shared with the campus community, and, after broad discussion and refinement, they will become the basis for working groups that will be appointed this summer.

4. A&S Student Symposium 2016—Cindy Bukach

Dr. Cindy Bukach was happy to announce that there is a phenomenal program for the 31st annual Arts and Sciences Student Symposium. She said this year we have 247 presentations with 364 student participants. This represents a 29% increase in student participation over last year. These students are mentored by 128 faculty from 30 different academic programs, representing a 19% increase in faculty participation.

Dr. Cindy Bukach also reminded faculty that the 31st annual Arts and Sciences Student Symposium will be held from 1 pm to 6 pm on Friday April 15th. Following the symposium, there will be a symposium dinner from 6:30-8:00 in the Alice Haynes Room of the Tyler Haynes Commons. This year President Crutcher is the keynote speaker.

Dr. Cindy Bukach also thanked faculty for their role in mentoring students and ensuring a smooth registration process. She explained that the registration deadline was a “hard” deadline this year, thus all late applications were rejected (8 in total).

5. New policy for promotion “bumps”

Dean Skerrett announced that, working with the Provost’s Office, the School of Arts & Sciences policy for salary “bumps” associated with faculty promotions will change, effective for the newly promoted faculty. Dean Skerrett explained that for the past four years, promotion to assistant provided a $3,000 bump and promotion to full provided a $5,000 bump. This year and in future, the salary bumps will be $5,000 for promotion to associate and $7,500 for promotion full. Therefore, newly promoted faculty members will see these salary “bumps” in pay for FY17.

6. T&P Digital Portfolios—Dr. Paul Achter

Dr. Paul Achter, who serves on the Tenure and Promotion Committee, reported to the faculty that in the upcoming academic year (16-17) and henceforth, tenure and promotion portfolios will be submitted electronically, through a Blackboard website. Dr. Achter demonstrated the template for a portfolio. Dr. Achter explained that this change in the policy follows last year’s successful trial, whereby digital portfolios were submitted in addition to binder copies of the portfolio. This year, there will be no paper copy of the portfolio. The portfolio will be submitted to the Tenure and Promotion Committee through digital means only.

7. IQS/SMART/URISE—Dr. April Hill

Dean Skerrett welcomed Dr. April Hill as new program coordinator for the Integrated and Inclusive Science programs. Dr. April Hill gave a summary of the Integrated Quantitative Science (IQS) course and the Science, Math, and Research Techniques (SMART) course. These courses have been developed over the past decade, with multi-million dollar grants from the HHMI. After three HHMI grants, we are now taking steps to institutionalize our interdisciplinary science and inclusive science initiatives.

8. Proposal to Amend the Requirements for the B.S. Degree

Dean Skerrett recollected the importance of mutually respectful deliberation in faculty governance. She reminded the faculty that the motion represents eighteen months of committee consultations, faculty meetings, revisions, further presentations, consultations, meetings, and further revisions. It is a document that reflects the Committee’s work in seeking reasonable compromise among divergent ideas, and is presented to secure overlapping consensus of the A&S faculty. The dean thanked the Ad Hoc Committee and its chair for their intensive work.

Dr. Kristin Nolin, Chair of the Ad Hoc Committee Reviewing the B.S. Degree Requirements, presented the Motion to Amend the Requirements for a B.S. Degree. The full document is attached to the agenda.

Dr. Peter Smallwood moved to approve the Motion to Amend the Requirements for a B.S. Degree. Dr. Mike Kerckhove seconded.

Dr. Bill Ross explained that he finds the proposed language too vague. He indicated that he does not support the proposal. However, he generously acknowledged and thanked the Committee.

Dr. Mike Kerckhove and Dr. April Hill spoke in favor of the proposal. They praised the flexibility that the proposal permits to departments that want to require new advanced quantitative methods now used in their disciplines.

Dr. Ted Bunn asked if practical and staffing implications had been taken into consideration and Dr. Kristin Nolin answered that they had. The Math Department anticipates an eventual reduction of one calculus course each semester.

Dr. Eugene Wu proposed a different option that he argued would be more expansive.

Dr. Nolin observed that the revision defines the B.S and B.A degrees independently and substantively.

As it was getting late, Dean Skerrett offered that, in her view, typically only members who are present in a meeting to hear the deliberation of their colleagues should vote on a motion; however, because this is a historic revision to a degree requirement, she strongly supports an electronic vote.

Dr. Ted Bunn motioned for an electronic vote. Dr. Bill Ross seconded. The motion for an electronic vote on the Motion passed by voice vote. The dean said that she would arrange for an electronic vote by secret ballot for all eligible A&S faculty voters.

After further discussion and deliberation of the Motion, the meeting adjourned at 5:00 p.m.