Monday, March 18, 2013

March 20, 2013 A&S Faculty Meeting Agenda

Our next faculty meeting will be held on March 20, 2013 at 4:00 p.m. in the Keller Hall Reception Room.



Our discussion agenda will be:

  1. Approval of the A&S faculty meeting minutes from February 14, 2013
  2. Approval of Academic Council Actions from February 19, 2013, March 5, 2013 and March 19, 2013
  3. Dean's report on annual merit review process




Announcement:  President Ed Ayers will join us at our next meeting on Thursday, April 25th to discuss the Summer Experience initiative and other matters. This meeting will be in the Keller Hall Reception Room.


February 14, 2013 A&S Faculty Meeting Minutes


Dean Kathleen Skerrett called the meeting to order at 4:01 p.m. in the Brown-Alley Room of Weinstein Hall.  Gene Anderson moved approval of the minutes of the Arts and Sciences faculty meeting from January 16, 2013. Jonathan Dattelbaum seconded the motion and the faculty voted to approve. Stephanie Cobb moved approval of Academic Council Actions from February 5.  Reed West seconded the motion and the faculty voted to approve.

Dean Skerrett reported that progress continues on developing a new faculty governance process for developing and revising the curriculum.

Dean Skerrett provided a debriefing of the Program-Based Budgeting (PBB) process.  The Dean provided an overview of the process that commenced in September.  Budget requests were received from department chairs and program chairs and forwarded to the Dean’s Advisory Council.  The Council met weekly from late October to early December to determine priorities.  The Dean described the various funding sources, including:  a surplus of $70,000 from FY12, $200,000 from salary surplus from FY12; and $24,000 from the continuing operating budget. The Dean’s Advisory Council reviewed all requests and made recommendations and the Dean made the final decision.  Requests included new budgets and enhanced continuing budgets.   The DAC recommended and the Dean approved seven one-time, non-continuing requests.

Position requests included eight staff positions and five tenure-stream positions.  The only faculty position approved for internal A & S funding was an Assistant Professor of Art.

Five requests were forwarded to Planning and Priorities and three of those were approved:  The approved requests were the GIS technician; Studio Arts Lab Manager; Assistant Professor in Physics.

Yvonne Howell asked about the process to decide what to fund internally and what to send to Planning and Priorities.  The Dean replied that they made strategic decisions with priorities and cost-sharing to make those requests persuasive to Planning  and Priorities.  She also noted that a chronic term position in Physics was converted to partially fund the tenure-stream Physics position.   The Dean is pleased with the outcome of the Planning and Priorities process.

Dean Skerrett reported that faculty mentoring stipends were not approved and she hopes to start building a budget for the stipends.  She does not see these stipends as compensation but as honoring the commitment of faculty to mentoring.

Gene Anderson asked about the amount of money in the plant fund.  Dean Skerrett replied with the amount, and noted that the fund is still designated for plant renovation and equipment.   She hopes that there may be some new policies concerning this use.

Gene Anderson then asked if equipment needs occur during the year, should faculty contact the Dean? The Dean responded that both the Science Initiative and the Arts Initiative are concerned with developing rolling five-year equipment plans for those areas.

Kathrin Bower asked further questions about the plant fund, such as “What is the rationale of the plant fund?”  The Dean does not fully understand the history of its development.  She suggested that we might want to think of other ways to use it, such as developing a quasi-endowment, etc.

Yvonne Howell asked about endowed chair positions that are not filled and the availability of those funds. Dean Skerrett replied that she plans to start reviewing endowments later in the spring, including the unfilled chairs.  Andrea Simpson asked about the Weinstein Fellows funding for interdisciplinary courses.  She stated that funding has vanished. The Dean replied that she does not know immediately about this program.  Dean Skerrett stated that she is working with the central budget office right now and their assistance will be essential in undertaking a review of our endowments.

The Dean said that, after consultation with the DAC, she would like to change the schedule for faculty position requests from the fall to the spring.  Kathrin Bower asked for further clarification on requests for positions and noted the need for ample time in preparing requests, etc.

Yvonne Howell asked if there is any way to produce a document, website, etc. that would provide further information on reviewing the curriculum as a whole, including enrollment, etc.  Is there a way to visualize it? The Dean agreed that this would be very helpful and perhaps options can be explored.

Dean Skerrett ended her discussion on PBB by thanking the faculty, chairs, and Dean's Advisory Council for participating in the new process.

Julie Laskaris encouraged faculty attendance at the upcoming Connecting the Humanities and the Professions, on March 21-22, 2013.

The remaining part of the faculty meeting was devoted to a presentation on Title IX.  Kerry Fankhauser (Associate Dean, Westhampton College) and Dan Fabian (Associate Dean, Richmond College) presented the latest information on Title IX regulations.

Dean Skerrett thanked the faculty for their presence at the meeting. The next Arts and Sciences meeting will be held on March 20 at 4 p.m. in Keller Hall Reception Room.
The meeting was adjourned at 5:15 p.m.


Respectfully submitted,

Lucretia McCulley

Thursday, March 14, 2013

March 19, 2013 Academic Council Agenda

Our next meeting will be Tuesday, March 19, 2013 from 10:30-11:45 a.m. in the Tyler Haynes Commons Room 305. Please review the agenda below and the cited materials in advance of the meeting.

Approval of minutes from the March 5, 2013 meeting.

Consent Agenda:

"Our colleagues in the Business School have made changes to the Economics major that require A&S approval because it will affect the A&S Economics major. The major change involves the statistics requirement. The rationale for the change is included in the first document. Last year the Business School approved a change to replace the two-semester statistics sequence (BUAD 201 & BUAD 301, Statistics for Business and Economics I & II) with a one-semester course (BUAD 202) with the understanding that a department could add a second-level statistics course. The Economics Department decided that their majors needed a second semester course. The ECON310 course (the second document) has been slightly modified and will now focus on trade. A new 300-level ECON course will focus on international monetary aspects of finance." 



Discussion Agenda:

-Report on annual performance reviews 
-Honors theses and faculty time -- Suzanne Jones
 

Wednesday, March 13, 2013

March 5, 2013 Academic Council Minutes

Dean Skerrett called the meeting to order at 10:30 a.m. The minutes of the February 19, 2013 meeting were approved.


 The English Department would like to change the number of English 364 Film Directors to English 379, a number not currently in use. There was no objection. 


Student development:

In the past, department chairs and other faculty members have expressed concern about how to address students’ mental health problems.  Colleagues in Student Life and CAPS offered a presentation on programs at the University of Richmond and recommended best practices.  The goal is to ensure that the lines of communication are open between Student Life and faculty members to help coordinate the timely support for our students in distress. Dr. Joseph Boehman, Dean of Richmond College, reminded faculty members that they are often the first line of defense for a troubled student. Dean Boehman discussed changes in behaviors, such as a drop in class attendance, can be signs of a larger problem.  More students are utilizing CAPS each year.  At the moment, 16% of students at the University of Richmond seek counseling each year. A lower stigma regarding mental illness and treatment, greater availability of medications, and increased academic pressure are a few reasons why there is an increase in students accessing college mental health services.  Currently, the greatest mental health risk at the University relates to over-consumption of alcohol.


AAUP: Tenure and teaching intensive appointments

Dean Skerrett resumed discussion about the demographics of the A&S faculty, particularly the growing proportion of non-tenure-line faculty.  The dean also introduced the AAUP link that was distributed via email, and invited Prof. Julie Laskaris to comment.  The increase in the role of non-tenure-line teachers has occurred across the profession.  The question is how to review, compensate, and ensure academic freedom and faculty citizenship to these teaching-intensive roles. Currently, 44% of the A&S faculty (by head-count) is non-tenure track and the number of director positions has increased over the last 5 years.  Members of Academic Council offered two queries for research:  1) How does the teaching load for directors at the University of Richmond compare to those at other schools, and 2) what proportion of courses are taught by non-tenure-line faculty members.  The dean’s goal is to have tenure-line faculty teach courses at all levels of the curriculum and all areas, including general education courses.  She encourages the faculty to exercise shared governance over the curriculum and educational program so that, as far as possible, the tenured faculty commit to teach the curriculum we collectively design.   The dean also noted that the demographic statistics of the A&S faculty indicate that diversifying the faculty continues to be a priority as we conduct each search. 


Honors Convocation:

This year’s A&S Honors Convocation will be April 9th at 11am in Camp Concert Hall. We have noticed that the event has not been well-attended.  In an attempt to highlight this event, the deans have decided to call it “ Honors Convocation: A Celebration of Student Achievement.”  Dean Skerrett’s longer-term vision is to connect Honors Convocation with the A&S Student Symposium and dinner.  The dean encouraged members to let her office know if there are other student awards that should be recognized at the Honors Convocation this year, or if members have any recommendations for re-designing the ceremony.  Please forward those suggestions to the dean’s office.   Invitations for the Convocation will be sent after the Spring Break.  Please encourage your faculty and students to attend.


The meeting was adjourned at 11:45am

Respectfully submitted,

Zandria Haines

Friday, March 1, 2013

March 5, 2013 Academic Council Agenda

Our next meeting will be Tuesday, March 5, 2013 from 10:30-11:45 a.m. in the Tyler Haynes Commons Room 305. Please review the agenda below and the cited materials in advance of the meeting.

Approval of minutes from the February 19, 2013 meeting.

Point of Information:

The English Department would like to change the number of English 364 Film Directors to English 379, a number not currently in use. 

Discussion Agenda:

-Student development presentation with Juliette Landphair, Joe Boehman, Lynne Deane, and Pete LeViness
-AAUP: Tenure and teaching-intensive appointments
-Demographics of the faculty: inquiries from Academic Council
-Honors Convocation 2013: A Celebration of Student Achievement  

February 19, 2013 Academic Council Minutes

Dean Skerrett called the meeting to order at 10:30 a.m. The minutes of the February 5, 2013 meeting were approved.

All proposals on the February 19, 2013 consent agenda were approved.


•A&S compliance training with Joan Neff and Shannon Sinclair

The dean welcomed Associate Provost Joan Neff and University Counsel Shannon Sinclair to Academic Council. Joan explained that all faculty and staff members at the University must complete compliance training. The presentation began with situational questions. Members answered how they would respond to the hypothetical situations. Shannon defined compliance and explained why the program is in place at the University. The program is designed to promote a culture of integrity and compliance with regulations. The program will also reinforce the University's commitment to excellence. The key elements of the University's program are board level oversight, code of organization ethics and integrity, clear delegation of compliance responsibilities, confidential reporting mechanism, compliance education, monitoring and auditing, appropriate corrective action, and annual review of the effectiveness of the compliance program.

 Shannon discussed the methods of reporting a compliance issue on campus. In addition to reporting issues to a department chair, dean, or a member of the administration, a person may report concerns through the Ethics and Compliance Helpline. This helpline is completely anonymous.  Please visit the University's compliance webpage with any questions about the compliance program.


•Teaching innovation and classroom master plan

 The dean invited Kevin Creamer to discuss the classroom master plan sessions.  The University is looking ahead to the next 10 years as programs have changed since the first plan was launched in 2005.  The university has contracted consultants to do an analysis of formal and informal teaching spaces and to generate ideas for aligning them with our pedagogies and programs.  The first round of meetings with the consultants took place in early February. The second round of meetings will take place the last week of February. A few sessions will be open to faculty.  You can find more information here.



 •Proposed changes to faculty handbook/faculty practices/directors

Following last year's listening series, the Dean asked the Directors to organize themselves and to advance an agenda of issues for the dean. Joe Essid presented the agenda to Academic Council. The dean and the Directors have worked through some issues.  The Directors have proposed some revisions to the faculty handbook that include eligibility for voting in departments, access to professional development resources, and a paid professional leave each ten years of continuous service.  After some discussion, many council members expressed concern regarding departmental voting, professional leaves, and position-based eligibility for resources.  Hugh West suggested that the issue of Directors' faculty rights be studied by a disinterested faculty committee appointed by regular means or the faculty status subcommittee of the University Faculty Council. It was suggested by the dean that Directors consider these reservations, and begin to prepare a revised proposal for discussion and deliberation in a faculty governance process.



•Distribution of Adjunct and term appointments

The dean asked Academic Council to look over a chart that shows the demographics for the School of Arts and Sciences, including the percentage of full-time faculty (by headcount) who are not in tenure-line positions.  It was suggested that it would be helpful to see the breakdown of how many adjuncts and term appointments teach general education classes. Dean Skerrett is concerned that the proportion of non-tenure-line faculty is increasing relative to tenure-line faculty.  While this is a national trend, she is concerned that we contributing to this situation without making an intentional plan to do so.  She would like to continue this discussion at the next meeting.




The meeting was adjourned at 11:55am

Respectfully submitted,

Zandria Haines