Dean Andy Newcomb called the meeting to order at 4:03 p.m. in the Brown-Alley Room of Weinstein Hall.
- The minutes of the September 16, 2010 meeting were approved as circulated.
- The actions of A&S Academic Council from October 19, 2010 were approved as circulated
Dean Newcomb opened the floor to a discussion of the proposed written guideline changes from the Faculty Research Committee (FRC).
Associate Dean Kathy Hoke reviewed the document distributed by the Faculty Research Committee at the beginning of the meeting, “Summary of Significant Changes to Written FRC (Faculty Research Committee) Guidelines – Fall 2010.”
Dean Newcomb then reviewed and clarified the process used in the Arts & Sciences dean's office for allocating and distributing faculty research funds, stipends, travel grants, etc., and the Faculty Research Committee’s role in this process.
Jonathan Dattelbaum from chemistry presented two proposed changes in the new written guidelines for the FRC that he distributed at the beginning of the meeting. These proposals were intended to modify the new written guidelines from the FRC. Much discussion followed Jonathan’s proposed changes.
Joanna Drell moved to table the proposals. The motion to table the proposals failed by a vote of 17 to reject the motion to a vote of 15 to table.
Additional discussions continued on the proposals and the new changes to the written FRC guidelines.
Dean Newcomb then distributed copies for discussion of a document which details the “FY09, FY10, FY11 Macro Budget Models” and on page 2 “a comparison chart of peer institution salaries for faculty by rank” used by the Arts & Sciences dean's office. Dean Newcomb highlighted how funds from the two charts related to Arts & Sciences support for faculty research and salary levels for “professor, associate, and assistant professor.
Following Dean Newcomb’s review of the budget models, discussion resumed on Jonathan Dattelbaum’s proposals to change the new written Faculty Research Committee guidelines.
A motion came forward to table Jonathan Dattelbaum’s proposals, to change the new written FRC guidelines, and forward his recommendations to the Faculty Research Committee; passed by a voice vote of those present at the meeting.
The meeting was adjourned at 5:06 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Jim Gwin, Substituting for Gene Anderson
Amended minutes of October 20, 2010
Dean Andy Newcomb called the meeting to order at 4:03 p.m. in the Brown-Alley Room of Weinstein Hall.
Associate Dean Kathy Hoke reviewed the document distributed by the Faculty Research Committee at the beginning of the meeting, “Summary of Significant Changes to Written FRC (Faculty Research Committee) Guidelines – Fall 2010.”
Dean Newcomb then reviewed and clarified the process used in the Arts & Sciences dean's office for allocating and distributing faculty research funds, stipends, travel grants, etc., and the Faculty Research Committee’s role in this process.
Jonathan Dattelbaum from chemistry presented two proposed changes in the new written guidelines for the FRC that he distributed at the beginning of the meeting. These proposals were intended to modify the new written guidelines from the FRC. Much discussion followed Jonathan’s proposed changes.
Joanna Drell moved to table the proposals. The motion to table the proposals failed by a vote of 17 to reject the motion to a vote of 15 to table.
Additional discussions continued on the proposals and the new changes to the written FRC guidelines.
Dean Newcomb then distributed copies for discussion of a document which details the “FY09, FY10, FY11 Macro Budget Models” and on page 2 “a comparison chart of peer institution salaries for faculty by rank” used by the Arts & Sciences dean's office. Dean Newcomb highlighted how funds from the two charts related to Arts & Sciences support for faculty research and salary levels for “professor, associate, and assistant professor.
Following Dean Newcomb’s review of the budget models, discussion resumed on Jonathan Dattelbaum’s proposals to change the new written Faculty Research Committee guidelines.
A motion came forward to table Jonathan Dattelbaum’s proposals, to change the new written FRC guidelines, and forward his recommendations to the Faculty Research Committee; passed by a voice vote of those present at the meeting.
The meeting was adjourned at 5:06 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Jim Gwin, Substituting for Gene Anderson
Amended minutes of October 20, 2010
Dean Andy Newcomb called the meeting to order at 4:03 p.m. in the Brown-Alley Room of Weinstein Hall.
- The minutes of the September 16, 2010 meeting were approved as circulated.
- The actions of A&S Academic Council from October 19, 2010 were approved as circulated
Dean Newcomb opened the floor to a discussion of the proposed written guideline changes from the Faculty Research Committee (FRC).
Associate Dean Kathy Hoke reviewed the document distributed by the Faculty Research Committee at the beginning of the meeting, “Summary of Significant Changes to Written FRC (Faculty Research Committee) Guidelines – Fall, 2010.”
Dean Newcomb then reviewed and clarified the process used in the Arts and Sciences Office for allocating and distributing faculty research funds, stipends, travel grants, etc., and the Faculty Research Committee’s role in this process.
Jonathan Dattelbaum from Chemistry presented two proposed changes in the new written guidelines for the FRC he distributed at the beginning of the meeting. These proposals were presented to modify the new written guidelines being proposed by the FRC. Much discussion followed Jonathan’s proposed changes.
Joanna Drell moved to the table the proposals. The motion to table the proposals failed by a vote of 17 to reject the motion to a vote of 15 to table.
Additional discussions continued on the proposals and the new changes to the written FRC guidelines.
Dean Newcomb then distributed copies for discussion of a document which details the “FY09, FY10, FY11 Macro Budget Models” and on page 2 “a comparison chart of peer institution salaries for faculty by rank” used by the Arts & Sciences Office. Dean Newcomb highlighted how funds from the two charts related to Arts & Sciences support for faculty research and salary levels for “professor, associate, and assistant professor.
Following Dean Newcomb’s review of the budget models, discussion resumed on Jonathan Dattelbaum’s proposals to change the new written Faculty Research Committee guidelines.
A motion came forward to table Jonathan Dattelbaum’s proposals to change the new written FRC guidelines, and forward his recommendations to the Faculty Research Committee passed by a voice vote of those present at the meeting.
The meeting was adjourned at 5:06 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Jim Gwin, Substituting for Gene Anderson
Associate Dean Kathy Hoke reviewed the document distributed by the Faculty Research Committee at the beginning of the meeting, “Summary of Significant Changes to Written FRC (Faculty Research Committee) Guidelines – Fall, 2010.”
Dean Newcomb then reviewed and clarified the process used in the Arts and Sciences Office for allocating and distributing faculty research funds, stipends, travel grants, etc., and the Faculty Research Committee’s role in this process.
Jonathan Dattelbaum from Chemistry presented two proposed changes in the new written guidelines for the FRC he distributed at the beginning of the meeting. These proposals were presented to modify the new written guidelines being proposed by the FRC. Much discussion followed Jonathan’s proposed changes.
Joanna Drell moved to the table the proposals. The motion to table the proposals failed by a vote of 17 to reject the motion to a vote of 15 to table.
Additional discussions continued on the proposals and the new changes to the written FRC guidelines.
Dean Newcomb then distributed copies for discussion of a document which details the “FY09, FY10, FY11 Macro Budget Models” and on page 2 “a comparison chart of peer institution salaries for faculty by rank” used by the Arts & Sciences Office. Dean Newcomb highlighted how funds from the two charts related to Arts & Sciences support for faculty research and salary levels for “professor, associate, and assistant professor.
Following Dean Newcomb’s review of the budget models, discussion resumed on Jonathan Dattelbaum’s proposals to change the new written Faculty Research Committee guidelines.
A motion came forward to table Jonathan Dattelbaum’s proposals to change the new written FRC guidelines, and forward his recommendations to the Faculty Research Committee passed by a voice vote of those present at the meeting.
The meeting was adjourned at 5:06 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Jim Gwin, Substituting for Gene Anderson
